There’s a time limit on comments?

Out of state and agitated. But I’ll get over it.  For the outside agitators post,

Whatever my outside opinion is worth, Oakland residents should have a greater say in a march if it provokes, because they have to live with the results more so than others do, especially when non-residents turn violent and destructive. Non-residents should respect the city whom they are a guest in.

However, being in the god-foresaken state of Nevada, with nowhere but to go into town to find an occupy group, I would hope the big city people would welcome the help. In our great capital, sadly I’ve not been welcome for simply trying to comunicate and have a voice to be heard.  But, I’ve found some acceptance with our great southern city, where there’s actual discusion online, without time limits 😉

As having lived in your great south bay city of San Jose for 43 years, I’m no stranger to Oakland, San Fransisco, and any other town around the Bay. But, does this give me some sort of  ‘right’  to make hay when I join another town’s action? No it does not. I would not even interject myself  into a group inorder to run it unless agreed to do so. Since Oakland is a city with more people than we have sagebrush, I’d defer to residents to hold sway over marches and so forth to insure their city is not burdened by outside assistants causing them trouble.

In my area, with the big city drawing 8 to 12 people for an ‘inside a warm building and has never had an outside encampment’ GA, I would not hesitate to interject my thoughts into discussions, because over half the people are from out of town.

So, work on your turf  issues, because it’s are important that they be resolved.