Statement on the Occupation of the former Traveler’s Aid Society at 520 16th Street

Categories: Open Mic, Reflections

by some friends of OO

Last night, after one of the most remarkable days of resistance in recent history, some of us within Occupy Oakland took an important next step: we extended the occupation to an unused building near Oscar Grant Plaza. We did this, first off, in order to secure the shelter and space from which to continue organizing during the coming winter months. But we also hoped to use the national spotlight on Oakland to encourage other occupations in colder, more northern climates to consider claiming spaces and moving indoors in order to resist the repressive force of the weather, after so bravely resisting the police and the political establishment. We want this movement to be here next Spring, and claiming unused space is, in our view, the most plausible way forward for us at this point. We had plans to start using this space today as a library, a place for classes and workshops, as well as a dormitory for those with health conditions. We had already begun to move in books from the library. The building we chose was perfect: not only was it a mere block from Oscar Grant Plaza, but it formerly housed the Traveler’s Aid Society, a not-for-profit organization that provided services to the homeless but, due to cuts in government funding, lost its lease Given that Occupy Oakland feeds hundreds of people every day, provides them with places to sleep and equipment for doing so, involves them in the maintenance of the camp (if they so choose), we believe this makes us the ideal tenants of this space, despite our unwillingness to pay for it. None of this should be that surprising, in any case, as talk of such an action has percolated through the movement for months now, and the Oakland GA recently voted to support such occupations materially and otherwise. Business Insider discussed this decision in an article entitled “The Inevitable Has Happened.” We are well aware that such an action is illegal, just as it is illegal to camp, cook, and live in Oscar Grant Plaza as we have done. We are aware that property law means that what we did last night counts as trespassing, if not burglary. Still, the ferocity of the police response surprised us. Once again, they mobilized hundreds of police officers, armed to the hilt with bean bag guns, tear gas and flashbang grenades, despite the fact that these so-called “less-than-lethal” weapons nearly killed someone last week. The city spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to protect one landlord’s right to earn a few thousand every month. Why is this? Whereas the blockade of the port – an action which caused millions of dollars of losses – met with no resistance, the attempt to take one single building, a building that was unused, met with the most brutal and swift response. The answer: they fear this logical next step from the movement more than anything else. They fear it because they know how much appeal it will have. All across the US thousands upon thousands of commercial and residential spaces sit empty while more and more people are forced to sleep in the streets, or driven deep into poverty while trying to pay their rent despite unemployment or poverty wages. We understand that capitalism is a system that has no care for human needs. It is a system which produces hundreds of thousands of empty houses at the same time as it produces hundreds of thousands of homeless people. The police are the line between these people and these houses. They say: you can stay in your rat-infested park. You can camp out here as long as we want. But the moment that you threaten property rights, we will come at you with everything we have. It is no longer clear who calls the shots in Oakland anymore. At the same time as OPD and the Alameda County Sheriffs were suiting up and getting ready to smash heads and gas people on 16th St, Mayor Quan was issuing a statement that she wished to speak to us about returning the building to the Traverler’s Aid Society. It is clear that the enmity between the Mayor and the Police has grown so intense that the police force is now an autonomous force, making its own decisions, irrespective of City Hall. This gives us even less reason to listen to them or respect the authority now. We understand that much of the conversation about last night will revolve around the question of violence (though mostly they mean violence to “property,” which is somehow strangely equated with harming human beings). We know that there are many perspectives on these questions, and we should make the space for talking about them. But let us say this to the cops and to the mayor: things got “violent” after the police came. The riot cops marched down Telegraph and then the barricades were lit on fire. The riots cops marched down Telegraph and then bottles got thrown and windows smashed. The riot cops marched down Telegraph and graffiti appeared everywhere. The point here is obvious: if the police don’t want violence, they should stay the hell away.

3872

One Response to “Statement on the Occupation of the former Traveler’s Aid Society at 520 16th Street”

  1. Oaklandsings

    I totally respect your message and want more than anything for everyone to work in unified force. So help me out here cuz there are things you’re saying that don’t add up for me in your statement. My understanding from friends on the ground and video is that the police didn’t show up until a large bonfire was created in the street with plastics and furniture being thrown into it creating toxic fumes. Apparently Quan was ready to talk until the bonfire was started, and that this specific action evoked police presence and excessive force. It seems if you had stayed focused on occupying the house then it would have been a successful non-violent action which could have had a huge impact on all levels and set a precedent for similar actions across the country – like you stated, love it! Unfortunately, by burning stuff out in the street you’re just asking for confrontation and, as the results show, it only stacks up the condemnation of the movement by the media and politicos and defeats everything we are working so hard for. Of course the cops are going to come down hard when burning stuff in the middle of a residential street – the 99% lives on that street too remember and they don’t want their houses burned down by some bonfire – there could be kids or elderly in those run down houses – come on. If we are actually going to make an impact then there needs to be consideration about taking actions that so intentionally evoke police presence – you folks shot yourselves in the foot and pulled us all into it. So I feel like I’m stating the obvious here, but if you had stuck to the powerful, well intentioned non-violent action of taking that house over then maybe things wouldn’t have gotten so out of hand. I agree that when the police show up the violence gets worse, I totally agree, and I agree with taking the house too for all the reasons you stated, but how did a bonfire in the street help anything except to incite police aggression? We’ve got to stop sabotaging the movement with violence that is not in self-defense and does not in any way further our goals but hinders them. Let’s keep our focus upon the goal and take actions that support this dismantling of the system rather than undermining ourselves by inviting police presence. I really do want to hear your thoughts and look forward to further discussion.
    – an Oakland resident