I know this has been kicking around the gay internet for the past few days, but it’s the Tuesday before Thanksgiving and there’s not much going on and you need to look at porn before you go back to mom’s house, right? Right!
Here’s a gay porn movie that was filmed during the Occupy Oakland protests.
New York-based homosexual smut peddler Dirty Boy Video put out a video called “Occupy My Throat” in which two hippie-ish twinks, who look like they might really be fighting income inequality and criminality of the banking system, suck each other off in a tent during the sit-in. We all knew they were having sex in their tents, but here’s definitive proof.
We don’t know how they filmed this between the tear gas, evictions, and murders but where there is a porn director with a will, there is always a way. Then again, while the B-roll was filmed at the protests, the sex in the tent could have been recorded in your mom’s backyard just as easily as the actual site.
Sure, this will just be fuel for critics of the movement. But they were going to hate it anyway. As for those of you who sympathize with the young men and women exercising their right to protest, it might just make you hot.
Want to see the NSFW hardcore trailer? I know you do. (The orignal gawker article, referenced below, has a hyperlink which I have here redacted).
When you’re done, please go shave your palms, then get back to protesting.
http://gawker.com/5862012/someone-filmed-a-gay-porn-movie-during-occupy-oakland
Maxine, Nancy, RSP, Gene, or whatever,
“Professionalism” is yet another buzz word of the 1%. It’s the tyranny of the customs, mannerisms, values that Northern Europeans believe one needs to exude if one is go be allowed into their board rooms.
Keep posting. You are a fount of self-incriminating knowledge.
Wow, we should just bow down to your apparent genious, Nancy, Maxine, Gene, RSP, or whatever you’re calling yourself at the moment.
I tremble at the clarity of your logic and coo at the brilliance of your pose.
You inspire me with your positive “can do” attitude such that I wet myself in anticipation for the next action I can take to stand with you.
Thank you. I agree, professionalism was the lacking element during the first five weeks of Occupy Oakland. By now, it hardly matters.
Really, think!? Why not live up to your “name”. I live up to mine.
I’m using the fear tactics of the 1%? Boy are you a dummie!
My understanding of certain methods does not mean I share the aims of those who employ them. On the contrary, by demonstrating a few of the minor ones, and shining the light on others of them, I’m doing a greater community service than you are, with your misplaced good intentions.
Think about it, thinkie-doo.
It’s a playpen. You’re allowed to make any mess you want inside of it, so long as you don’t get out. Your “movement” doesn’t need to be infltrated or micromanaged because it flies a false flag.
miccheck: “Why not make a protest a party?” The Occupiers tactic is to party before the battle, tire themselves out, then be defeated by the police. Genuine revolutionaries celebrate victory, which comes after the battle. Why not?
Inspiration is all well and good if it sustained and if there is follow-through. This depends on crystallized thinking (which turns out to be an effective antidote to confusion, btw). Then, a third thing is necessary. So long as you believe that fun is a virtue, that third thing wil elude you.
To return to your question of “Why not?”, the answer is because your efforts are doomed to fail and no one will take you seriously. “Why not?” Because you’ve lost public support.
Heya Sweetpea. I agree with you, completely.
I was only referring to Nancy Oakes, who baits people on this forum into wasting time arguing about nothing. (S)he said her/himself that the only reason (s)he is on here is to undermine support for Occupy. Furthermore, (s)he lies about who (s)he is.
I respect difference of opinion, and I am all for debate and discussion, even if it gets heated and doesn’t follow the “rules!”
think! :
We shouldn’t just listen to people who are cool and follow the right rules of engagement, though, right? Cuz then we would miss a lot of important info. Does that make sense?
If you’re talking about the person who posted here, that is, because I think these are really thoughtful articles.
Agreed. Constructive dialogue about differing opinions is important. But if someone is undermining a constructive conversation by insulting and criticizing with the sole intent of destroying the movement, that is when it crosses the line to wasting time.
The name-calling and baiting to which you refer does NOTHING to further our cause. It is a mere distraction, and our energies can be better spent elsewhere.
there are many reasons why not to. can you think of any? all of the things you might mention to support “partying” (morale, inspiration, innovation, creativity, connection, statement, fun, happiness, sustainability) would actually be far better supported with hard, sober, joyful work. we’d get more results and feel better about ourselves, too.
Of course we can have the very occasional party – but “make the protest a party”? That sounds insane, off point, and downright dangerous to a lot of people. i’m talking about changing the party:work ratio from 80:20 to 20:80.
Yeah, but we *do* need people to disagree with us. It’s called cognitive dissonance and it’s sort of like a Darwinian way of getting ideas to evolve and change and strengthen. When people like Nancy challenge us strongly, we feel threatened and respond. But the thing is that there are ways and there are ways to disagree. Coming and saying “you are all whores for George Soros” or something to that effect has no value in terms of having a civilized discussion. David Heatherly and I went back and forth about an issue quite a few times without resorting to name-calling or baiting.
Anonymity on the Internet is a great thing. It’s powerful, but with great power comes great responsibility.
Why not make a protest a party? Crystallized thinking shuts down inspiration.
Oh, and her skills as a “professional negotiator” can’t be missed… she’s so talented at enlightening people to her genius points of view!
Yes, Tlahtolli… Nancy is a true marvel, isn’t (s)he?
I also admire the fact that Nancy walked six miles every day from her home in Piedmont to Oscar Grant and Snow Park for an entire month! And she is/was a professional negotiator!
It would be great to have Nancy’s leadership and expertise on our side, but she seems to think that we’re ushering in martial law as part of the New World Order, or something to that effect. It seems that Nancy has an understanding of what we should do, but she won’t let us in on her secret. How coy of her! Oh Nancy… you’re such a tease.
Can’t you see you have us all worked up about you?
*gush*
Nancy Oakes is using the fear tactics if the 1%. For those of you who are fooled by his/her bullshit, please re-read her posts, and you will see the pervasive lies.
Do you think most of us can’t see through you, whoever you are? We know what you are doing and where you come from. You may be fooling a few but not most. So sorry, but your undermining attempts to spread paranoia within Occupy Oakland is never going to work.
YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME.
What’s dangerous? NANCY OAKES is DANGEROUS. She, she or IT is using the fear tactics of the 1% to spread paranoia and undermine the movement.
i think this is such a shame. just like the ridiculou party when you “occupied” 19th and telegraph. this was supposed to be a protest, not a party. have some respect, do some work.
I’ve not seen this level of professional trolling in a while. I do admire professionals when I see them!
Negative Nancy,
I find it interesting that you feel you need to cut and paste the same post several times in this thread.
You claim not to be a prude yet you post something to get the homophobes’ juices flowing.
You claim not to be a troll. Yet you seem to have a need to repost the same thing over and over as if we who read these forums have no attention span or comprehension.
Criticism is always welcome if it’s constructive. I have to agree with others here that your comments don’t seem to be constructive or particularly helpful.
If you are an elder activist, then please act like one and lead. Sniping on an Internet forum doesn’t seem to be a fitting use of an elder activist’s energy. Showing up to guide and advise newer activists would seem to be a more fitting use of your energy and more welcome.
I love dissenters because they bring necessary evolution to a movement. If this energy could be used in a constructive way to guide the moment into becoming the revolution it needs to be, then I would welcome that.
“They could be dangerous” — it seems like you are fucking dangerous, like you want the people to be dangerous. How about a nonviolent revolution? It’s the only way it’s going to happen right now. If we fail, the violent revolution will be forced upon us in the next 5 to 15 years.
And by the way, I noticed that your name is “Oakes” — any relation? It does not have to end this way, in bitterness. We can all learn lessons, keep moving forward, in peace and with love.
“you kinda look like a troll yourself” — what an ugly comment. Wow, you are really doing a good job of putting your point across.
I disagree, I think you come off as rather paranoid when you talk about “thinktank fueled by the 1%.” Occupy is messy, we’re in a rather complicated situation. Messy problems don’t have neat and easy solutions, which is what this “real revolution” that you’re talking about sounds like to me. Sorry, it will not be Nancy Oakes’ revolution. It will be the one that we create together. Or it will fizzle out, which is fine with me because I know the history of Occupation — the Alcatraz Occupation in 69/70, for example, which “failed” in the sense that the whole thing was infested with drug-dealing and opportunism by the end, but began with a noble goal. Alcatraz Occupation is cherished by SF activists and Native American activists around the world because it put a spotlight on the Native American at a time when our Native peoples were barely even a part of the media debate about America. The Alcatraz Occupation did not create a new successful communal way of living for Native Americans, but it gave an amplified voice to the oppressed people’s and gave fuel to their activist movements. Don’t allow anybody in the 1% or in the MSM to tell you what is and what is not a “failure.”
What’s a “real” revolution? I hope it isn’t violent because conservatives populate the military and police forces.
or the Tea Party.
If that’s true, it’s pretty smart: create a fake “grassroots” movement in order to divert people’s anger away from the oligarchs and plutocrats.
It’s pretty sad, isn’t it, that the same thing happened to the Tea Party, although I think they’re more easily mobilized by Fox News.
How are we all going to die, Nancy?
It’s right on cue because people are, in fact, starting to wake up. They’re legitimately angry. They could be dangerous, if their anger were appropriately focused. Therefore, the 1% need weapons of mass distraction … such as Occupy.
My fear is not that it will fail, but that it will succeed. We simply disagree about its goals.
While there is no explicit set of demands, the goal is to neutralize you in a critical hour (like Anthrax did to Congress in ’01). The implied goals are the “protesters” are not the real goals of the “movement”, which is not so grassroots as it appears.
The real revolution is the one that actually removes the oligarchs and the plutocrats from power while there is still time (and it’s later than you think).
I won’t care about vegetable gardens at city hall if we’re all dead … will you?
I see you copy-pasted that from somewhere else in these threads, which is efficient.
What you said is all probably true, but there is no evidence for what you are saying. At this point, all you are defending is your opinion.
And if Occupy Oakland is such a failure, then there would be nothing for you to worry about if everything you said was true, right, because it’s destined to failure.
Please enlighten us about the “real” revolution and how this particular one plays into the needs of the oligarchs and plutocrats. Why is this right on cue?
COINTELPRO? Don’t flatter yourself!
If you’d read the thread before acting on your compulsion to complain, you’d have the answers to your questions, whether stated or implied. I have appended the relevant portion for your convenience, since work is not to the taste of most occupiers.
It’s the Occupy movement specifically that worries me. I love Oakland and enjoy a bit of sexual diversity myself. I’m no bigot or prude. I’m not even as worried about the occasional $40 blow job (as long as I’m not giving or getting it) as it seems, though the public deserves to know what degenerates you attract.
The lack of integrity toward any political motivation is disturbing, but there is something worse than than afoot.
Occupy is showing signs of having been conceived in an extremist thinktank funded by the 1%. It’s purposes seem to be to usher in martial law (and to distract you from more serious wars brewing elswhere), to reduce critical thought and to promote groupthink in its place.
The lack of message or mission is its chief recruiting tool. The anti-democratic hand signals are just creepy. The human mic is a trick to get people to yell things that that might not actually agree with. I could go on, of course. It still comes down to the same two things:
1. Occupy has a dark motive.
2. Its well meaning followers are deceived.
The movement plays right into the needs of the oligarchs and plutocrats, not into those of the 99%. It’s a scam delivered right on cue instead of the real revolution that is rightfully due.
Occupy is a soft-coup that bodes ill for us all, even the ruling class who are less in control than they imagine.
-Concerned Citizen
If you’d read the thread before acting on your compulsion to complain, you’d have the answers to your questions, whether stated or implied. I have appended the relevant portion for your convenience, since work is not to the taste of most occupiers.
That said, I couldn’t care less what you appreciate.
It’s the Occupy movement specifically that worries me. I love Oakland and enjoy a bit of sexual diversity myself. I’m no bigot or prude.
Occupy is showing signs of having been conceived in an extremist thinktank funded by the 1%. It’s purposes seem to be to usher in martial law (and to distract you from more serious wars brewing elswhere), to reduce critical thought and to promote groupthink in its place.
The lack of message or mission is its chief recruiting tool. The anti-democratic hand signals are just creepy. The human mic is a trick to get people to yell things that that might not actually agree with. I could go on, of course. It still comes down to the same two things:
1. Occupy has a dark motive.
2. Its well meaning followers are deceived.
The movement plays right into the needs of the oligarchs and plutocrats, not into those of the 99%. It’s a scam delivered right on cue instead of the real revolution that is rightfully due.
Occupy is a soft-coup that bodes ill for us all, even the ruling class who are less in control than they imagine.
-Concerned Citizen
Nancy, you appear to have a lot of anger at the Occupy Oakland participants.
You are also posting lots of posts written in very condescending, hostile, divisive ways.
I appreciate the links on this post.
I don’t appreciate your chastising, angry tone, & your constant reference to what “you kids,” “you people” should do.
If you were a part of the group & no longer are willing to include yourself in it, then I’m sorry, & I would like to know the details of what happened, so those of us who are still in it can learn.
It seems like you’re not willing to move on, though, & I don’t see how these posts are helping you or anyone else.
If you’re willing to communicate about this, I’d appreciate it.
If you’re only willing to post criticism & insults, then you are in fact trolling, no matter what your motive might be.
Hi Nancy Oakes,
It seems that you would like to help bring the Occupy movement down… but smut? Really? That’s an old COINTELPRO tactic right out of the book. And most of our sensibilities have already been numbed to gay sex. This *is* 2011 and the Occupy movement is pretty progressive, and progressives aren’t afraid of teh gays.
To tell you the truth, most of us would like to see constructive dialogue happening here on the forums, but it does seem that it has been taken over by trolls intent on discrediting the movement. But I’ll tell you what the presence of trolls is going to do, Nancy. It’s going to make the movement smarter. Think of it as evolution. We will learn, we will adapt, and we will win, or at least exist in peace and harmony.
Thanks,
Tlahtolli
Do you talk to your mother that way?
And don’t tell your elders how to act, either.
I have no desire to be called anything at all, nor am I acting.
In typical Occupy fashion, you threw the first stone before gauging my experience or my intent.
In fact, you did so across all my posts.
In short, you pulled an “Uptown” move — an overextension of your own short shightedness.
Not so noble, after all.
It’s the Occupy movement specifically. I love Oakland and enjoy a bit of sexual diversity myself.
Occupy is showing signs of having been conceived in an extremist thinktank funded by the 1%. It’s purposes seem to be to usher in martial law (and to distract you from more serious wars brewing elswhere), to reduce critical thought and to promote groupthink in its place.
The lack of message or mission is its chief recruiting tool. The anti-democratic hand signals are just creepy. The human mic is a trick to get people to yell things that that might not actually agree with. I could go on, of course. It still comes down to the same two things:
1. Occupy has a dark motive.
2. Its well meaning followers are deceived.
The movement plays right into the needs of the oligarchs and plutocrats, not into those of the 99%. It’s a scam delivered right on cue instead of the real revolution that is rightfully due.
Occupy is a soft-coup that bodes ill for us all, even the ruling class who areless in control than they imagine.
Thanks for the intelligent questions! I wish I had heard more such challenges and fewer platitudes and denials when they would have counted for something.
-Concerned Citizen
If you don’t want me to call you a Troll don’t act like one.
Do not repay evil with evil, but give thought to what is noble in the sight of all.
You don’t need to conduct personal attacks on people involved to get your point across.
I’m sorry I called you a Troll.
Peace.
It’s one thing to criticize OO, though your frequent and bitter posts and comments throughout the ‘reflections’ section suggests more spurned lover than concerned citizen. However, you betray something a but uglier by resorting to one of the last refuges of a scoundrel, homophobia, in this post.
I would like to know if, after one month, you are rejecting the Occupy movement in general, or is it just Oakland that offends you? Or is it gay sex that you object to?
You should be grateful fro my lady-like instinct to remove the preview of that smut from this post. Your hippie friends might have demonstrated similar discretion if they were politically motivated and there to do more than party and get wasted.
In fact, you kinda look like a troll yourself.
Dumbshit alert!
Just because you don’t agree with me doesn’t make me a troll. In fact, I’m an expert witness. I camped for a month both at City Hall and Snow Park.
You show the same intolerance for diversity that others, notably the Media Committee of Occupy Oakland, shows, especially when confronted with an inconvenient truth.
Troll alert!