Community Choice Energy is under yet another attack by PG&E and the monopoly utilities. A just-announced draft resolution e-4907 will come to a vote on February 8 at a hearing of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). If it passes it could create a de facto freeze on future community choice programs. The resolution could possibly lead to one- to two-year delays for new Community Choice efforts, especially those created to serve disadvantaged communities like in Los Angeles County or in the Central Valley. But it’s not only future Community Choice efforts that could be negatively impacted—the resolution is also of concern to existing programs.
Help keep the promotion and expansion of renewable energy alive in California. Send a short letter to the CPUC before Tuesday, Jan 30. (The PUC extended the comment period and postponed the hearing because they got so many comments. Let’s keep up the pressure!) Please draw freely from the talking points below, and be sure to personalize it. Using only one talking point or the topic of one paragraph from the sample letter is fine.
Here are basic talking points. Follow the links below for more details.
1. The resolution is an abuse of CPUC power
The resolution circumvents normal CPUC public process, with no public hearings before the vote and a comment period that includes the winter holidays. This rushed process suggests that the CPUC is using a technical pretext for a sneak attack on Community Choice, one that would allow the CPUC to withhold certification and mandate operational processes and time frames that over-reach its authority and would imperil the viability of new Community Choice programs.
2. E-4907 continues a pattern of CPUC bias against Community Choice
E-4907 is the latest of CPUC efforts over recent years to undermine Community Choice programs. CPUC bias against Community Choice in favor of the state’s monopoly utilities has taken many forms, including explicit statements of bias, cost shifting and rate-setting that undermines Community Choice competitiveness, and many others. These are all documented in CPUC Bias Favoring Monopoly Utilities Against Community Choice.
3. The resolution is an overblown response to a market issue
If the objective of E-4907 is really to fix a potential problem in the double purchase of resource adequacy capacity, due to emerging Community Choice programs and the competing monopoly utility both procuring capacity for the same customers, then there are simple, more direct ways to solve the problem that would not imperil Community Choice. For instance, monopoly utilities could continue to procure resource adequacy as before, but be reimbursed by Community Choice programs once they are up and running.
4. Community Choice is the chosen model
Since the passage the Community Choice law, AB 117, in 2002, the people of California have fought off multiple attempts by the monopoly utilities to undercut local control of energy decision-making. By the end of 2018, eighteen Community Choice energy programs are set to be serving customers in California, and sixteen other jurisdictions are in the process of forming programs. Soon Community Choice will serve more than half the electrical load in California. The CPUC has no authority under law to interfere with the will of the people of California.
5. Communities deserve local control
Alameda County will soon be served by East Bay Community Energy (EBCE), which will provide multiple benefits including lower-cost renewable energy for residents and development and control of local renewable energy resources. These choices should be available to other communities throughout California, and the CPUC has no authority to delay and obstruct the formation of such programs.
Resources:
Send a pre-scripted letter (which you can edit) via Action Network
Position paper from the California Alliance for Community Energy
Talking points from the Clean Power Exchange
CPUC Commissioner Contact Information
CPUC Resolution E-4907
Instructions for sending comments to the PUC
For more information, see the Clean Power Exchange action page.
PLAN TO ATTEND WHEN THE RESOLUTION COMES TO A VOTE AT THE PUC:
WHEN:
Thursday, February 8, 9:30 AM — arrive early to get a seat
Stay tuned for news of a press conference and rally to be held on the steps of the PUC.