Sacramento Abridges the First Amendment on the Anniversary of the World Trade Center Attack

Categories: Announcements, Discussion, En Español, Open Mic, Reflections

Video Message;

Let us remember the words of Theodore Roosevelt “It is the people, and not the judges, who are entitled to say what their constitution means, for the constitution is theirs, it belongs to them and not to their servants in office — any other theory is incompatible with the foundation principles of our government.”

September 11th 2012, on the anniversary of the World Trade Center Attack, Sacramento City Council approved protest restrictions, on 9-11, adopting Chapter 12.74, abridging the First Ammendment Right of Freedom of Speech and Assembly; Adding a FEE and permit requirement to assemble. This is a traitorous act of treason and destruction of the Constitution by public servants elected to uphold oath of office.

Take part in the resistance by joining our Facebook Event;

Title 18, US Code Sec.2381:
In the presents of two or more witnesses of the same overt act, or in a open court of law, if you fail to timely move to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office, you are subject to the charge of capital felony treason.

Marbury v. Madison: 5 US 137 (1803):
“No provision of the Constitution is designed to be without effect,” “Anything that is in conflict is null and void of law”, “Clearly, for a secondary law to come in conflict with the supreme Law was illogical, for certainly, the supreme Law would prevail over all other laws and certainly our forefathers had intended that the supreme Law would be the bases of all law and for any law to come in conflict would be null and void of law, it would bare no power to enforce, in would bare no obligation to obey, it would purport to settle as if it had never existed, for unconstitutionality would date from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law, no courts are bound to uphold it, and no Citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a near nullity or a fiction of law.”
If any statement, within any law, which is passed, is unconstitutional, the whole law is unconstitutional by Marbury v. Madison.

Do Not Remain Silent


Comments are closed.